The clinical value of ß-blockers in patients with stable angina.

Stable angina, one manifestation of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), is characterised by intermittent episodes of insufficient blood supply to the myocardium, provoking symptoms of myocardial ischaemia, particularly chest pain. These attacks usually occur during exercise or stress. Anti-ischaemic drugs are the mainstay of pharmacologic management of CCS with symptoms of angina. ß-blockers reduce heart rate and myocardial contractility, thus reducing myocardial oxygen consumption. These drugs have been shown to ameliorate the frequency of anginal attacks and to improve exercise capacity in these patients. Current management guidelines include ß-blockers as a first-line management option for most patients with CCS and symptoms of myocardial ischaemia, alongside dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCB). The presence of comorbid angina and heart failure is a strong indication for starting with a ß-blocker. ß-blockers are also useful in the management of angina symptoms accompanied by a high heart rate, hypertension (with or without a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system [RAS] blocker or CCB), or microvascular angina (with a RAS blocker and a statin). A ß-blocker is not suitable for a patient with low heart rate (<50 bpm), although use of a ß-blocker may be supported by a pacemaker if the ß-blocker is strongly indicated) and should be used at a low dose only in patients with low blood pressure.

Heart failure management with ß-blockers: can we do better?

Heart failure (HF) is associated with disabling symptoms, poor quality of life, and a poor prognosis with substantial excess mortality in the years following diagnosis. Overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system is a key feature of the pathophysiology of HF and is an important driver of the process of adverse remodelling of the left ventricular wall that contributes to cardiac failure. Drugs which suppress the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, including ß-blockers, are foundation therapies for the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and despite a lack of specific outcomes trials, are also widely used by cardiologist in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Today, expert opinion has moved away from recommending that treatment for HF should be guided solely by the LVEF and interventions should rather address signs and symptoms of HF (e.g. oedema and tachycardia), the severity of HF, and concomitant conditions. ß-blockers improve HF symptoms and functional status in HF and these agents have demonstrated improved survival, as well as a reduced risk of other important clinical outcomes such as hospitalisation for heart failure, in randomised, placebo-controlled outcomes trials. In HFpEF, ß-blockers are anti-ischemic and lower blood pressure and heart rate. Moreover, ß-blockers also reduce mortality in the setting of HF occurring alongside common comorbid conditions, such as diabetes, CKD (of any severity), and COPD. Higher doses of ß-blockers are associated with better clinical outcomes in populations with HF, so that ensuring adequate titration of therapy to their maximal (or maximally tolerated) doses is important for ensuring optimal outcomes for people with HF. In principle, a patient with HF could have combined treatment with a ß-blocker, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor/neprilysin inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and a SGLT2 inhibitor, according to tolerability.

ß-Receptor blocker enhances the anabolic effect of PTH after osteoporotic fracture.

The autonomic nervous system plays a crucial role in regulating bone metabolism, with sympathetic activation stimulating bone resorption and inhibiting bone formation. We found that fractures lead to increased sympathetic tone, enhanced osteoclast resorption, decreased osteoblast formation, and thus hastened systemic bone loss in ovariectomized (OVX) mice. However, the combined administration of parathyroid hormone (PTH) and the ß-receptor blocker propranolol dramatically promoted systemic bone formation and osteoporotic fracture healing in OVX mice. The effect of this treatment is superior to that of treatment with PTH or propranolol alone. In vitro, the sympathetic neurotransmitter norepinephrine (NE) suppressed PTH-induced osteoblast differentiation and mineralization, which was rescued by propranolol. Moreover, NE decreased the PTH-induced expression of Runx2 but enhanced the expression of Rankl and the effect of PTH-stimulated osteoblasts on osteoclastic differentiation, whereas these effects were reversed by propranolol. Furthermore, PTH increased the expression of the circadian clock gene Bmal1, which was inhibited by NE-ßAR signaling. Bmal1 knockdown blocked the rescue effect of propranolol on the NE-induced decrease in PTH-stimulated osteoblast differentiation. Taken together, these results suggest that propranolol enhances the anabolic effect of PTH in preventing systemic bone loss following osteoporotic fracture by blocking the negative effects of sympathetic signaling on PTH anabolism.

The role of the peripheral and central adrenergic system in the construction of the subjective emotional experience of panic.

RATIONALE: Although the study of emotions can look back to over 100 years of research, it is unclear which information the brain uses to construct the subjective experience of an emotion. OBJECTIVE: In the current study, we assess the role of the peripheral and central adrenergic system in this respect. METHODS: Healthy volunteers underwent a double inhalation of 35% CO2, which is a well-validated procedure to induce an intense emotion, namely panic. In a randomized, cross-over design, 34 participants received either a ß1-blocker acting selectively in the peripheral nervous system (atenolol), a ß1-blocker acting in the peripheral and central nervous system (metoprolol), or a placebo before the CO2 inhalation. RESULTS: Heart rate and systolic blood pressure were reduced in both ß-blocker conditions compared to placebo, showing effective inhibition of the adrenergic tone. Nevertheless, the subjective experience of the induced panic was the same in all conditions, as measured by self-reported fear, discomfort, and panic symptom ratings. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that information from the peripheral and central adrenergic system does not play a major role in the construction of the subjective emotion.

Association of Beta-Blocker Use With Exercise Capacity in Participants With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Post Hoc Analysis of the RELAX Trial.

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) often receive ß-blocker (BB) therapy for management of co-morbidities. However, the association of BB therapy with exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in HFpEF is not well-studied. In this post hoc analysis of the Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in HFpEF (RELAX) trial, which included patients with chronic stable HFpEF with peak exercise capacity assessment at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks of follow-up, we evaluated the association of BB use with the measures of exercise capacity (peak exercise oxygen uptake), anaerobic threshold, and HRQL (Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire). Separate linear mixed-effect models were constructed for each outcome with adjustment for treatment arm, demographics, medical history, left ventricular ejection fraction, and duration of heart failure. Of the 216 study participants (median age 69 years, 48.2% women), 76% reported BB use at baseline. Participants with (vs without) BB therapy were older (70 vs 63.5 years, p = 0.001) and had a higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease (44% vs 23%, p = 0.01). In the adjusted linear mixed model, BB use over time was not associated with peak exercise oxygen uptake (ß 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2 (-0.31 to 0.7), p = 0.5) and 6-minute walk distance (ß 95% CI 14.69 [-14.25 to 43.63], p = 0.3). However, BB use was associated with a higher anaerobic threshold (ß 95% CI 0.32 (0.02 to 0.62), p = 0.036) and better HRQL (lower quality of life as assessed by Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire score) (ß 95% CI -6.68 [-10.96 to -2.4], p = 0.002). Future trials are needed to better evaluate the effects of BB on exercise capacity in patients with chronic stable HFpEF.

Health equity in heart failure.

The treatment of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has substantially developed over the past decades. More than ever before, the application of appropriate evidence-based medical therapy for HFrEF is associated with remarkable improvements in survival, noteworthy increases in quality of life, and a marked reduction in symptomatic HF sufficient to warrant hospitalization. These enhanced clinical outcomes are driven by the "four pillars" of HF therapy: 1) evidence-based beta blockers, 2) Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors /angiotensin II receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, 3) mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and most recently, 4) sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Despite robust evidence from well-conducted randomized clinical trials, guideline-directed medical therapies with established cardiovascular benefits remain significantly underutilized in clinical practice, particularly among under-represented minority populations. This phenomenon has led to class 1 level recommendations from the 2022 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Failure Society of America Guidelines to address HF disparities among vulnerable populations as follows. In this article, we highlight the difference between health equality and health equity and discuss the need to address equity in the treatment of heart failure, ensuring that the impressive progress made in the treatment of HFrEF is equally beneficial to all individuals. We discuss strategies to reduce and ultimately eliminate disparities in the determinants of health that particularly affect marginalized groups, including the socioeconomic determinants and racism as a threat to public health. Finally, we discuss and propose a combination of the four pillars of ethics with the four pillars of GDMT to optimize and personalize treatment of all patients with HFrEF, to achieve true equity in the treatment of HF.

Clozapine-related tachycardia: A conundrum to identify and treat.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the rates and persistence of clozapine-induced tachycardia and heart-rate differences in patients treated with ß-blockers in the largest sample of patients with a psychotic disorder to date. METHOD: An audit of medical files for 101 patients who attended a clozapine community clinic and analysis of monthly measurements of resting heart rates. RESULTS: 51% met the clinical criteria for tachycardia. Heart rates were stable over time. ß-blockers were associated with small but significant reductions in heart rates. CONCLUSION: The cardiovascular risks of clozapine are often overlooked. ß-blockers are useful in lowering heart rates but they may be insufficient to reduce cardiac risk.

Beta-blocker adjunct therapy as a prospective anti-metastatic with cardio-oncologic regulation.

The prevailing treatment stratagem in cancer therapy still challenges the dilemma of a probable metastatic spread following an initial diagnosis. Including an anti-metastatic agent demands a significant focus to overrule the incidence of treatment failures. Adrenergic stimulation underlying the metastatic spread paved the way for beta blockers as a breakthrough in repurposing as an anti-metastatic agent. However, the current treatment approach fails to fully harness the versatile potential of the drug in inhibiting probable metastasis. The beta blockers were seen to show a myriad of grip over the pro-metastatic and prognostic parameters of the patient. Novel interventions in immune therapy, onco-hypertension, surgery-induced stress, induction of apoptosis and angiogenesis inhibition have been used as evidence to interpret our objective of discussing the potential adjuvant role of the drug in the existing anti-cancer regimens. Adding weight to the relative incidence of onco-hypertension as an unavoidable side effect from chemotherapy, the slot for an anti-hypertensive agent is necessitated, and we try to suggest beta-blockers to fill this position. However, pointing out the paucity in the clinical study, we aim to review the current status of beta blockers under this interest to state how the drug should be included as a drug of choice in every patient undergoing cancer treatment.

Ivabradine could not decrease mitral regurgitation triggered atrial fibrosis and fibrillation compared with carvedilol.

BACKGROUND: Ivabradine, a medical treatment for heart failure (HF), reduces heart rate (HR) and prolongs diastolic perfusion time. It is frequently prescribed to patients with HF who have a suboptimal response or intolerance to beta-blockers. Degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) is a valvular heart disease often associated with the development of HF and atrial fibrillation (AF). However, studies comparing the effects of ivabradine and beta-blockers on MR are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the potential therapeutic effects of ivabradine and carvedilol on MR using a rat model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using a novel echo-guided mini-invasive surgery, MR was created in 12-weeks-old Sprague-Dawley rats. After 2 weeks, the rats were randomized to receive either ivabradine or carvedilol for 4 weeks. Echocardiography was performed at baseline and at two-week intervals. Following haemodynamic studies, postmortem tissues were analysed. Notably, the MR-induced myocardial dysfunction did not improve considerably after treatment with ivabradine or carvedilol. However, in haemodynamic studies, pharmacological therapies, particularly carvedilol, mitigated MR-induced chamber dilatation (end-systolic volume and end-diastolic volume; MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.05) and decreased compliance (end-systolic pressure-volume relationship; MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.05). Compared with ivabradine, a shorter duration (MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.05) and reduced inducibility (MR vs. MR + Carvedilol and MR vs. MR + Ivabradine; P < 0.05) of AF were observed in MR rats treated with carvedilol. Similarly, reduced cardiac fibrosis and apoptosis were observed in the MR rat model in the treatment groups, especially in those treated with carvedilol (MR vs. MR + Carvedilol; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Although both ivabradine and carvedilol, at least in part, mitigated MR-induced chamber dilatation and decreased compliance, carvedilol had a better effect on reversing MR-induced cardiac fibrosis, apoptosis, and arrhythmogenesis than ivabradine. When compared with Ivabradine, MR rats treated with carvedilol exhibited a shorter duration and reduced inducibility of AF, thus providing more effective suppression of HCN4. Further investigations are required to validate our findings.

Mitigation of Nitrogen Mustard-Induced Skin Injury by the ß-Blocker Carvedilol and Its Enantiomers.

The chemical warfare agent sulfur mustard and its structural analog nitrogen mustard (NM) cause severe vesicating skin injuries. The pathologic mechanisms for the skin injury following mustard exposure are poorly understood; therefore, no effective countermeasure is available. Previous reports demonstrated the protective activity of carvedilol, a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ß-blocker, against UV radiation-induced skin damage. Thus, the current study evaluated the effects of carvedilol on NM-induced skin injuries in vitro and in vivo. In the murine epidermal cell line JB6 Cl 41-5a, ß-blockers with different receptor subtype selectivity were examined. Carvedilol and both of its enantiomers, R- and S-carvedilol, were the only tested ligands statistically reducing NM-induced cytotoxicity. Carvedilol also reduced NM-induced apoptosis and p53 expression. In SKH-1 mice, NM increased epidermal thickness, damaged skin architecture, and induced nuclear factor κB (NF-κB)-related proinflammatory genes as assessed by RT2 Profiler PCR (polymerase chain reaction) Arrays. To model chemical warfare scenario, 30 minutes after exposure to NM, 10 µM carvedilol was applied topically. Twenty-four hours after NM exposure, carvedilol attenuated NM-induced epidermal thickening, Ki-67 expression, a marker of cellular proliferation, and multiple proinflammatory genes. Supporting the in vitro data, the non-ß-blocking R-enantiomer of carvedilol had similar effects as racemic carvedilol, and there was no difference between carvedilol and R-carvedilol in the PCR array data, suggesting that the skin protective effects are independent of the ß-adrenergic receptors. These data suggest that the ß-blocker carvedilol and its enantiomers can be repurposed as countermeasures against mustard-induced skin injuries. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The chemical warfare agent sulfur mustard and its structural analog nitrogen mustard cause severe vesicating skin injuries for which no effective countermeasure is available. This study evaluated the effects of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ß-blocker carvedilol on nitrogen mustard-induced skin injuries to repurpose this cardiovascular drug as a medical countermeasure.

Mechanism and application of ß-adrenoceptor blockers in soft tissue wound healing.

Soft tissue damage stimulates sympathetic nerves to release large amounts of catecholamine hormones which bind to ß-adrenergic receptors (ß-ARs) on the cell membrane surface. It activates the downstream effector molecules and impairs soft tissue wound healing. ß-blockers specifically inhibit ß-ARs activation in acute/chronic skin lesions and ulcerative hemangiomas. They also accelerate soft tissue wound healing by shortening the duration of inflammation, speeding keratinocyte migration and reepithelialization, promoting wound contraction and angiogenesis, and inhibiting bacterial virulence effects. In addition, ß-blockers shorten wound healing periods in patients with severe thermal damage by reducing the hypermetabolic response. While ß-blockers promote/inhibit corneal epithelial cell regeneration and restores limbal stem/progenitor cells function, it could well accelerate/delay corneal wound healing. Given these meaningful effects, a growing number of studies are focused on examining the efficacy and safety of ß-blockers in soft tissue wound repair, including acute and chronic wounds, severe thermal damage, ulcerated infantile hemangioma, corneal wounds, and other soft tissue disorders. However, an intensive investigation on their acting mechanisms is imperatively needed. The purpose of this article is to summerize the roles of ß-blockers in soft tissue wound healing and explore their clinical applications.

The ß-Blocker Carvedilol and Related Aryloxypropanolamines Promote ERK1/2 Phosphorylation in HEK293 Cells with K A Values Distinct From Their Equilibrium Dissociation Constants as ß 2-Adrenoceptor Antagonists: Evidence for Functional Affinity.

The determination of affinity by using functional assays is important in drug discovery because it provides a more relevant estimate of the strength of interaction of a ligand to its cognate receptor than radioligand binding. However, empirical evidence for so-called, "functional affinity" is limited. Herein, we determined whether the affinity of carvedilol, a ß-adrenoceptor antagonist used to treat heart failure that also promotes extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) phosphorylation, differed between these two pharmacological activities. Four structurally related ß-adrenoceptor antagonists (alprenolol, carazolol, pindolol, propranolol) that also activated ERK1/2 were included as comparators to enhance our understanding of how these drugs work in the clinical setting. In HEK293 cells stably expressing the human ß 2-adrenoceptor carvedilol and related aryloxypropanolamines were partial agonists of ERK1/2 phosphorylation with potencies ([A]50s) that were lower than their equilibrium dissociation constants (K Bs) as ß 2-adrenoceptor antagonists. As the [A]50 of a partial agonist is a good approximation of its K B, then these data indicated that the affinities of carvedilol and related ligands for these two activities were distinct. Moreover, there was a significant negative rank order correlation between the [A]50 of each ligand to activate ERK1/2 and their intrinsic activities (i.e., as intrinsic activity for ERK1/2 phosphorylation increased, so did affinity). Genome editing revealed that the transducer that coupled the ß 2-adrenoceptor to ERK1/2 phosphorylation in response to carvedilol and other ß 2-adrenoceptor antagonists was Gαs. Collectively, these data support the concept of "functional affinity" and indicate that the ability of the ß 2-adrenoceptor to recruit Gαs may influence the affinity of the activating ligand. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In HEK293 cells overexpressing the human ß2-adrenoceptor carvedilol and four related aryloxypropanolamines behaved as ß2-adrenoceptor antagonists and partial agonists of ERK1/2 phosphorylation with rank orders of affinity that were distinct. These data imply that carvedilol and other ß-blockers can stabilize the ß2-adrenoceptor in different affinity conformations that are revealed when functionally distinct responses are measured. This is the basis for the pharmacological concept of "functional affinity."

Prevention of activated brown adipose tissue on 18F-FDG-PET scans of young lymphoma patients: results of an ancillary study within the EuroNet-PHL-C2 trial.

Activated brown fat (aBAT) is known to affect the evaluation of 18F-FDG PET scans, especially in young patients. The aim of this study was to determine factors influencing the occurrence of aBAT, and to investigate the effectiveness of the two preventive measures, warming and beta-blocker (propranolol) administration. Five-hundred-twenty-eight 18F-FDG-PET scans of 241 EuroNet-PHL-C2 trial patients from 41 nuclear medicine departments in Germany and Czech Republic were screened for aBAT. The occurrence of aBAT was analyzed with patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, predisposition to aBAT), weather data at the day of 18F-FDG PET scanning as well as the preventive measures taken. Potentially important factors from univariate analyses were included into a logistic regression model. Warming as a preventive measure was used in 243 18F-FDG-PET scans, propranolol was administered in 36, warming and propranolol were combined in 84, and no preventive measures were taken in 165 scans. Whereas age, sex and body mass index had no clear impact, there was an individual predisposition to aBAT. Logistic regression model revealed that the frequency of aBAT mainly depends on the outside temperature (p = 0.005) and can be effectively reduced by warming (p = 0.004), the administration of unselective beta-blocker or the combination of both. Warming is a simple, cheap and non-invasive method to reduce the frequency of aBAT. However, the effect of warming decreases with increasing outside temperatures. Administration of propranolol seems to be equally effective and provides advantages whenever the positive effect of warming is compromised. The combination of both preventive measures could have an additive effect.

Trial watch: beta-blockers in cancer therapy.

Compelling evidence supports the hypothesis that stress negatively impacts cancer development and prognosis. Irrespective of its physical, biological or psychological source, stress triggers a physiological response that is mediated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic adrenal medullary axis. The resulting release of glucocorticoids and catecholamines into the systemic circulation leads to neuroendocrine and metabolic adaptations that can affect immune homeostasis and immunosurveillance, thus impairing the detection and eradication of malignant cells. Moreover, catecholamines directly act on ß-adrenoreceptors present on tumor cells, thereby stimulating survival, proliferation, and migration of nascent neoplasms. Numerous preclinical studies have shown that blocking adrenergic receptors slows tumor growth, suggesting potential clinical benefits of using ß-blockers in cancer therapy. Much of these positive effects of ß-blockade are mediated by improved immunosurveillance. The present trial watch summarizes current knowledge from preclinical and clinical studies investigating the anticancer effects of ß-blockers either as standalone agents or in combination with conventional antineoplastic treatments or immunotherapy.

Improved Cardiac Performance and Decreased Arrhythmia in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Non-ß-Blocking R-Enantiomer Carvedilol.

BACKGROUND: Hypercontractility and arrhythmia are key pathophysiologic features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), the most common inherited heart disease. ß-Adrenergic receptor antagonists (ß-blockers) are the first-line therapy for HCM. However, ß-blockers commonly selected for this disease are often poorly tolerated in patients, where heart-rate reduction and noncardiac effects can lead to reduced cardiac output and fatigue. Mavacamten, myosin ATPase inhibitor recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, has demonstrated the ability to ameliorate hypercontractility without lowering heart rate, but its benefits are so far limited to patients with left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction, and its effect on arrhythmia is unknown. METHODS: We screened 21 ß-blockers for their impact on myocyte contractility and evaluated the antiarrhythmic properties of the most promising drug in a ventricular myocyte arrhythmia model. We then examined its in vivo effect on LV function by hemodynamic pressure-volume loop analysis. The efficacy of the drug was tested in vitro and in vivo compared with current therapeutic options (metoprolol, verapamil, and mavacamten) for HCM in an established mouse model of HCM (Myh6R403Q/+ and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes from patients with HCM (MYH7R403Q/+). RESULTS: We identified that carvedilol, a ß-blocker not commonly used in HCM, suppresses contractile function and arrhythmia by inhibiting RyR2 (ryanodine receptor type 2). Unlike metoprolol (a ß1-blocker), carvedilol markedly reduced LV contractility through RyR2 inhibition, while maintaining stroke volume through α1-adrenergic receptor inhibition in vivo. Clinically available carvedilol is a racemic mixture, and the R-enantiomer, devoid of ß-blocking effect, retains the ability to inhibit both α1-receptor and RyR2, thereby suppressing contractile function and arrhythmias without lowering heart rate and cardiac output. In Myh6R403Q/+ mice, R-carvedilol normalized hyperdynamic contraction, suppressed arrhythmia, and increased cardiac output better than metoprolol, verapamil, and mavacamten. The ability of R-carvedilol to suppress contractile function was well retained in MYH7R403Q/+ iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes. CONCLUSIONS: R-enantiomer carvedilol attenuates hyperdynamic contraction, suppresses arrhythmia, and at the same time, improves cardiac output without lowering heart rate by dual blockade of α1-adrenergic receptor and RyR2 in mouse and human models of HCM. This combination of therapeutic effects is unique among current therapeutic options for HCM and may particularly benefit patients without LV outflow tract obstruction.

Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial of High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I-Guided Combination Angiotensin Receptor Blockade and Beta-Blocker Therapy to Prevent Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity: The Cardiac CARE Trial.

BACKGROUND: Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity has a variable incidence, and the development of left ventricular dysfunction is preceded by elevations in cardiac troponin concentrations. Beta-adrenergic receptor blocker and renin-angiotensin system inhibitor therapies have been associated with modest cardioprotective effects in unselected patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy. METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point trial, patients with breast cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving anthracycline chemotherapy underwent serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before and 6 months after anthracycline treatment. Patients at high risk of cardiotoxicity (cardiac troponin I concentrations in the upper tertile during chemotherapy) were randomized to standard care plus cardioprotection (combination carvedilol and candesartan therapy) or standard care alone. The primary outcome was adjusted change in left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months. In low-risk nonrandomized patients with cardiac troponin I concentrations in the lower 2 tertiles, we hypothesized the absence of a 6-month change in left ventricular ejection fraction and tested for equivalence of ±2%. RESULTS: Between October 2017 and June 2021, 175 patients (mean age, 53 years; 87% female; 71% with breast cancer) were recruited. Patients randomized to cardioprotection (n=29) or standard care (n=28) had left ventricular ejection fractions of 69.4±7.4% and 69.1±6.1% at baseline and 65.7±6.6% and 64.9±5.9% 6 months after completion of chemotherapy, respectively. After adjustment for age, pretreatment left ventricular ejection fraction, and planned anthracycline dose, the estimated mean difference in 6-month left ventricular ejection fraction between the cardioprotection and standard care groups was -0.37% (95% CI, -3.59% to 2.85%; P=0.82). In low-risk nonrandomized patients, baseline and 6-month left ventricular ejection fractions were 69.3±5.7% and 66.4±6.3%, respectively: estimated mean difference, 2.87% (95% CI, 1.63%-4.10%; P=0.92, not equivalent). CONCLUSIONS: Combination candesartan and carvedilol therapy had no demonstrable cardioprotective effect in patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy with high-risk on-treatment cardiac troponin I concentrations. Low-risk nonrandomized patients had similar declines in left ventricular ejection fraction, bringing into question the utility of routine cardiac troponin monitoring. Furthermore, the modest declines in left ventricular ejection fraction suggest that the value and clinical impact of early cardioprotection therapy need to be better defined in patients receiving high-dose anthracycline. REGISTRATION: URL: https://doi.org; Unique identifier: 10.1186/ISRCTN24439460. URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search; Unique identifier: 2017-000896-99.

Safety and Efficacy of Traditional Heart Failure Therapies in Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis and Heart Failure.

Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated mortality benefits for several medication classes in patients with heart failure (HF), especially with reduced ejection fraction (EF). However, the benefit of these traditional HF therapies in patients with HF from cardiac amyloidosis is unclear. our study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of traditional HF therapies in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and HF with reduced EF or HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF). We conducted a single-center retrospective study. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis and HF with reduced EF or HF with mid-range EF between January 2012 and 2022. The primary outcomes of interest were medication use patterns (for ß blockers [BB], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEI], angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs], angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors [ARNI], and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists [MRAs]); potential medication side effects (symptomatic bradycardia, fatigue, hypotension, lightheadedness, and syncope); hospitalization; and death. The associations of BB, ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and MRA use with clinical outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression. A total of 82 patients met study criteria. At time of cardiac amyloidosis diagnosis, 63.4% were on a BB, 51.2% were on an ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and 43.9% were on an MRA. At last follow-up, 51.2% were on a BB, 35.4% were on an ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and 43.9% were on an MRA. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of potential medication side effects in patients on the medication class compared with those who were not. There was no association with hospitalization or mortality for baseline or follow-up BB, ACEI/ARB/ARNI, or MRA use. In conclusion, BBs, ACEI/ARB/ARNIs, and MRAs may be safely used in this population. However, their use does not appear to improve mortality or hospitalization.